Streets of simcity free#

Streets of simcity free#

If you have evidence, though, feel free to voice out and return this sentence into the article. The second sentence is omitted, since I have yet to hear any commercial making fun of any glitches in the game. I've replaced this passage with one containing problems on the game's unexpected crashes and collision detection. These are more of sloppy graphics, and there were more serious problems encountered in the game. I feel the first sentence is not true to the facts. Even the game itself makes fun of the glitches, in its fake radio commercials within the game. Such errors included people walking backwards and being able to drive through trees. Referring to an extraction from the previous edit: It keeps saying how Maxis totally strayed from the style of their other games and claims the music is possibly the only good part of the game.can we get a rewrite? 199.8.168.68 16:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Reply If you feel the article needs improvement, why don't you do it yourselves? - Taraborn ( talk) 11:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Reply Because Wikipedia is filled with idiots and I shouldn't need to stoop to their level to correct an article that will only be overwritten with the same critism. I agree.this article is written very negatively. I sincerly hate wikipedia now, so I refuse to correct it, I would rather badger others about it. This article primarly amerates the bugs and issues with the game claiming that it sucks with backdoor comments (everyone can 'truely' read between the lines) and that no one plays it (which it blatantly constantly says). Yes, it is an old game, buggy at times, but it was a fun game. Insulting anything from the cars, the weapons, or external software.

It is bad when an article insults its topic in the opening statment, but this article makes numerious 'point of view' references.